Text: Luke -30, Nehemiah 8:1-10 W 3rd Sunday after Epiphany
Good News to the Poor
In the name of him who is the sum,
substance, and fulfillment of all Scripture, dear friends in Christ: Did you notice the interesting contrast
between this morning’s Old Testament and Gospel readings? In the Gospel we’ve got Jesus in the
synagogue at his home town of
Now compare that unhappy ending to the Old Testament lesson. There we have Ezra the scribe leading a worship service. He has as his text what’s called the Book of the Law of Moses, which means the entire first five books of the Bible. He spends from early morning until – at least six hours altogether – alternately reading passages from the Bible and then explaining what they mean. That is to say he was preaching a sort of rambling sermon of continuous commentary between the various readings. The congregation stands there listening to him for half a day (they didn’t sit for worship in those days and certainly not in padded pews). And as they listen, they are overcome with emotion and moved to tears by what they hear. But then they are told to cheer up and be filled with the joy of the Lord. Go home. Celebrate. Have a great big feast, which they do.
Well, you don’t need to be a genius to figure it out: the combined moral of these two stories couldn’t be any more clear, could it? In order to affect you more deeply with the power of God’s Word and give you cause to celebrate and be glad every week, and at the same time guarantee my own personal safety and well-being, I need to preach longer sermons. I wouldn’t have thought that would be the case; but there it is: the evidence is right before you. No? … Okay, I’m prepared to admit that maybe it’s not the comparative length of the sermons that accounts for the difference in the responses of these two congregations to what they heard. It could be (and I’m just saying maybe here) that I’ve focused on the wrong detail and drawn the wrong conclusion. But if so, how shall we account for the difference? Why is one group changed radically for the better by their time spent listening to an exposition of God’s Word while the other is turned into an angry, Christ-hating lynch mob?
Your first guess might have something to do with the content of what the two groups heard. Maybe one group heard nothing but good news and the other a message filled with threats and insults. That might account for the way they responded—but I don’t think so. I mean look: the people mentioned in the passage from Nehemiah were weeping and mourning over the message they heard. That means that they were likely hearing a devastating message of Law. They were hearing about how they had failed to keep God’s commands and they were feeling bad about themselves and their sins. Usually people don’t like their sins exposed. They get angry and defensive; but these are the people that we’re told went home happy. Jesus, on the other hand, delivers a message of pure Gospel. He speaks of good news for the poor, release for the prisoners, and sight for the blind. He says he’s come to declare the year of the Lord’s favor. That’s all good stuff. It ought to make people happy to hear it – and especially to hear Jesus say that he’d come to fulfill all these things. But no, it’s the crowd listening to this good news that becomes violent. So it doesn’t seem to be the difference in the content of the messages that accounts for the starkly divergent ways way the people responded because their behavior is exactly opposite of what you’d expect.
Well then, if that’s not it, another guess might have
something to do with the comparative speaking skills of the preachers; but here
again, I think we’d be barking up the wrong tree. I mean sure, Ezra was a probably a fine
preacher, maybe even one of the best; but I doubt that he could have held a
candle to Jesus. Besides, the Gospel
lesson clearly states that the congregation in
So, it doesn’t seem to be what the congregations heard nor how it was told to them that is responsible for transforming one congregation into a nest of angry hornets and the other into a rejoicing throng of God’s saints. And for argument’s sake, we’re still saying that it had nothing to do with the comparative lengths of the sermons (though I personally remain unconvinced. I’m certain that a six hour sermon would make you all so happy you just couldn’t stand it. Really, I’m sure you couldn’t stand it). But anyway, look: if it’s not the message, or the message length, or the messenger that made such a difference, what could it be? Well, what else is left?
Could it be that the difference is in the congregations themselves? At first glance it would appear not, since both groups are composed entirely of Jewish believers, and it’s probably safe to assume that in both cases we’re dealing with a typical cross section of their society. But if we dig a little deeper, we’ll see there is indeed quite a bit of difference in their circumstances and recent experiences – and more importantly, in the way they see themselves. It’s in this, I think we will discover, in the way that the individuals that comprise these two groups perceive themselves, their needs, and the purposes for which they have gathered that makes all the difference in the world.
The people in the congregation
mentioned in the reading from Nehemiah were mostly Jews who had only recently returned
from the exile in
All that remained of the Jewish
nation were those captives taken in the years before. They languished in
But that changed all of a
sudden. The once mighty empire of
So now, as this group gathered to hear the reading of God’s Word and its explanation, they did so with an overwhelming sense of humility and appreciation. They had known poverty, hunger, weakness, and captivity. Now they were free, well fed, strong, and prosperous. And it’s important to understand that they had been deprived in a spiritual sense as well – unable to fulfill the rich and meaningful rites of worship and the festivals the Lord had prescribed for them … until now, that is. And so it was with a hunger to learn and know what God had to say that they listened and heard about what they had been neglecting. They heard too how far they were from living in ways that the Lord had commanded, and this cut them to the heart. That’s why they began to weep and mourn as God’s Word was explained to them. And it’s why Ezra had to tell them, “No, this is good. It’s a day to celebrate. The Lord is speaking to us again, and listening to him and walking in his ways we will know his forgiveness, his peace, and his joy.” For them God’s Word was a living treasure, and they could see it being fulfilled in their lives.
But fast forward now some five hundred years to the congregation that Jesus is addressing. Here the sense of wonder at hearing the Word of God has long ago expired. They know the stories very well; but they’re ancient history now. They are a record of what God did with their people once upon a time. In fact, there’s a sense of smug superiority and over familiarity with the Scriptures. They have them down cold—and that’s a good way to say it: cold. They aren’t so much a living treasure as they are just worn out old words on ancient paper. The people in the congregation talk about them and argue about them because that’s what’s expected; but it’s a mechanical, lifeless sort of thing. They outwardly follow the commands of God because that’s what they do as Jews. But the meaning of the words and the power behind them don’t penetrate. They roll off them like water off a freshly waxed car. “The Lord acted in past; not now. But that’s okay; because we’ve got everything under control. We’ve never really known poverty, oppression, weakness, or captivity – which is proof enough that the Lord is happy with us just the way we are. All we have to do is maintain the status quo.”
Now Jesus gets up to speak. He reads to them the passage from Isaiah about the Lord’s Anointed proclaiming good news to the poor, liberty to the captives, sight to the blind, and so on. Then he sits down and says, “That’s talking about me. That’s what I have come to do.” And the implication is “I’ve come to do those things for you.”
Well, they’ve heard the stories
about his going around teaching and healing people in the cities and towns of
And so Jesus reminds them of two
stories from their history that they knew very well about times when God’s
people had rejected his prophets, the men the Lord had sent to proclaim his
Word. In both cases God’s own people
felt that they didn’t need to hear any more of what God had to say. They had everything under control. Life was good. Or so they thought. In truth, their attitude was the same as that
of the church at
Let it not be that we make the same mistake. A short while ago you sang, “Just as I am, poor, wretched, blind”. You said that you’d come here to Jesus, the Lamb of God, for “riches, sight, and healing of the mind”. Let me ask you, did you mean it? Did you really have the expectation that Jesus would do that for you today? Or were you just mouthing the familiar words to a old and lifeless hymn? I could ask the same thing about the general confession of sins earlier in this service. You said, “I am by nature sinful and unclean”. You said that you had offended God by your sins and justly deserved his punishment. You asked for his forgiveness in Christ Jesus who was given as the atoning sacrifice on the cross, and you asked for his grace and power to delight in the will of God and to walk in his ways. Did you mean it? Or was it simply a mechanical repetition of overly familiar phrases? Did you have any real expectation that Jesus who is here with us by his Word would actually grant your request, set you free, and empower you to live to God’s glory?
What these contrasting readings we have before us show so clearly is that the difference between a positive, life-changing worship experience and a fruitless, negative one hasn’t got so much to do with the skill of the preacher or the length of his message, nor does it have a lot to with the content of the message, provided, of course, that it is God’s Word rightly explained. The biggest difference has to do with you and how you see yourself and your needs. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is good news for those who understand that they are in a spiritual sense poor, wretched, and blind. It is power and joy for those who see themselves as rescued and redeemed captives, but just an empty drill of religious duty for those who imagine that they are well fed, rich in Spirit, completely enlightened, and that they have everything in their lives under control.
Jesus said, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor.” May he give us the grace to know and feel our desperate spiritual poverty whenever and as often as we come to worship, so that we may rejoice upon hearing his message: “Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” In Jesus’ holy name. Amen.
Soli Deo Gloria!